Kinolime
  • Competitions
  • Sign in
Kinolime
  • Competitions
    • Submit a Screenplay
    • Competition Rules
    • Competition Hub
    • Production Hub
  • Media
    • Podcast Hub
    • News Hub
  • Learn
    • Screenplay Coverage
    • Screenwriting Guides
    • Courses
    • How it works
    • Explore the Filmmaking Process
  • Community
    • NXT World
    • Kino Lounge
    • Blog
    • Library
  • About
    • Careers
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Press
  • Help Center

Competition

Home pageCompetition HubHow It WorksSubmission Release

Company

About KinolimePressCareersBlogContact us

Site Info

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceTerms & ConditionsCode of ConductAccessibility Statement

Resources

How to read a Screenplay?What is Screenplay Coverage?Podcast HubLearnSupport Centerwww.kinolime.in
Kinolime
Follow us on social:
©2026 Kinolime Inc
411_WIRE \ Industry NewsPublished Oct 20, 2026 2 min read

Top Agencies and Producers Launch the American Entertainment Alliance

By Kinolime Editorial Team // Verified Human Journalist Review

Summary

CAA, WME and UTA, joined by producers including Jason Blum, Ron Howard and Brian Grazer, want Congress to require Netflix, Disney, Amazon and Skydance to spend 50% of original content budgets on independent U.S. productions.
"A new group called the American Entertainment Alliance plans to lobby Congress for bipartisan legislation that would require the largest entertainment companies to devote half of their original content budgets to independent productions, TheWrap reported on October 15, citing a New York Times report published the day before. TheWrap named Netflix, Disney, Amazon and Skydance as the companies that would be covered, and said the work in question would be made in the U.S. by entities outside the studios.
The effort is backed by the three largest talent agencies, CAA, WME and UTA, along with producers including Jason Blum, Peter Chernin, Ron Howard and Brian Grazer, according to TheWrap. The A.V. Club, also citing the Times, listed Mark Burnett among the producers and reported that the group wants streamers to bid on projects in an open marketplace, arguing this would increase competition, production and consumer choice. CAA chief Bryan Lourd told the Times, ""There are fewer people deciding what gets made and what we all see, what the consumer sees,"" adding, ""Distribution is not the issue of the future. Who finances content is the issue.""
No bill text, bill number or congressional sponsor has been made public. TheWrap noted the Times' reporting that the targeted companies run large Washington lobbying operations and are likely to oppose the measure, arguing they already buy plenty of content from outside producers. Both outlets framed the push as a modern echo of the Financial Interest and Syndication Rules, which kept broadcast networks from owning most of the shows they aired until the rules were repealed in the 1990s."
Share Wire:
The Kinolime Lens
"The proposal is aimed at the single biggest structural change in the business over the last decade: the shift from licensing projects to owning them outright. Streamers built their libraries on cost plus deals, where an outside producer is paid a fixed premium over budget and gives up back end participation in exchange. That model made the buyer the owner of nearly everything, which is exactly what the Fin-Syn rules were written to prevent in the network era. When those rules fell in the early 1990s, vertical integration followed within a few years, and independent television producers largely disappeared as a class. The alliance is betting that Washington, already debating a federal production incentive, will see a jobs and competition argument in reversing that.
The alliance's makeup matters as much as its demand. Agencies earn commissions on deals, and an open market where several buyers bid for finished or packaged projects produces higher prices and more back end than cost plus ever did. Producers like Blum and Grazer have the leverage to profit from that, and so would the financiers and completion lenders who currently struggle to recoup on streamer pickups. The obstacles are real, though: the bill does not exist yet, the companies named spend heavily on lobbying, and a rule tying private content budgets to ownership structure invites First Amendment and definitional fights over what counts as independent. Even a failed bill can move behavior, as studios sometimes offer voluntary concessions to head off regulation. For anyone financing features outside the studio system, the more immediate signal is that the agencies now see ownership, not distribution, as the central fight, and they will steer their packaging accordingly."

Source:

AV Club

Corrections:

No corrections.

Contact:

See an error? Contact us